Comparison of Ambulance Usage Characteristics in Children Between the Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Periods in Turkey

Objective: A pandemic is an epidemic of an infectious disease that has spread across a large region of the world and affects many people. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on ambulance use by pediatric patients in Ankara Province, Turkey. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the spring-summer of 2019 and 2020. The electronic medical records of pediatric patients who were transported to the hospital by ambulance were analyzed. Results: It was determined that 49.6% of the 23.201 patients included in the study were transported during the pandemic period. Male gender was higher in both the pandemic and pre-pandemic periods, there was no difference in terms of average age. The rate of forensic cases and refugee patients increased, while that of emergency patients decreased. Both the arrival at the scene time and intervention time were prolonged. Medical cause was the most common cause of emergency calls in both years, however, it increased significantly in 2020. The decrease in cases of traffic accidents, suicides, and other accidents was statistically significant. In the pandemic period, total rate of COVID-19 infection and suspicion was 29.7%. Most of the patients had been referred to a public hospital. Conclusion: It was found that most of the ambulances were used for transporting patients with minor illnesses that did not require immediate medical attention in pandemic period. (English) [ FROM AUTHOR] Amaç: Pandemi, dünyanın geniş bir bölgesine yayılan ve birçok insanı etkileyen bulaşıcı hastalık salgınıdır. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'nin Ankara ilinde, 2019 koronavirüs hastalığı (COVÍD-19) pandemisinin çocuk hastaların ambulans kullanımına etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu retrospektif çalışmada 2019 ve 2020 yıllarının bahar-yaz aylarında ambulans ile hastaneye nakledilen çocuk hastaların elektronik tıbbi kayıtları incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya alınan 23201 hastanın %49.6'sının pandemi döneminde nakledildiği belirlendi. Erkek cinsiyet hem pandemi hem de pandemi öncesi dönemlerde daha yüksekti, yaş ortalamaları açısından fark yoktu. Pandemi döneminde adli vaka ve mülteci hasta oranı artarken, acil hasta oranı azaldı. Hem olay yerine gelme süresi hem de müdahale süresi uzadı. Medikal nedenler her iki yılda da en sık acil çağrı nedeniydi, ancak 2020'de önemli ölçüde arttı. Trafik kazası, özkıyım ve diğer kaza vakalarındaki azalma istatistiksel olarak anlamlıydı. Pandemi döneminde toplam kesin ve şüpheli COVÍD-19 enfeksiyonu oranı %29.7'di. Hastaların çoğu devlet hastanesine sevk edildi. Sonuç: Pandemi döneminde ambulansların çoğunun acil tıbbi müdahale gerektirmeyen hafif hastalığı olan hastaları taşımak için kullanıldığı tespit edildi. (Turkish) [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Pediatric Disease / Cocuk Hastaliklari Dergisi is the property of Turkish Journal of Pediatric Disease and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

Role of lung ultrasonography in the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, the use of lung ultrasonography (LUS) to diagnosis lung findings was evaluated in patients with suspected COVID-19 who were admitted to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This observational clinical study was conducted in the ED of the Ankara City Hospital during the period April 1-30, 2020. Patients who were admitted to the ED were triaged as COVID-19 infected and who agreed to undergo LUS/LCT (lung computed tomography) were included in the study. RESULTS: Included in the study were 40 patients who had been prediagnosed with COVID-19. Pneumonia was detected with LCT in 32 (80%) patients, while the LUS examination identified pneumonia in 23 patients. The most common finding in LCT was ground-glass opacity (n = 29, 90.6%). Of the 23 patients with pneumonia findings in LUS, 15 (65.2%) had direct consolidation. Among the 32 patients who were found to have pneumonia as a result of LCT, 20 (62.5%) had signs of pneumonia on LUS examination, and 12 had no signs of pneumonia. In addition, 3 patients showed no signs of pneumonia with LCT, but they were misdiagnosed with pneumonia by LUS. The sensitivity of LUS in the diagnosis of pneumonia in the COVID-19 patients was 62.5%, while its specificity was 62.5%. In addition, its positive predictive value was 87.0%, and its negative predictive value was 29.4%. CONCLUSION: LUS may also be used in the diagnosis of pneumonia in COVID-19 patients because it is a valuable and accessible bedside diagnostic tool.

The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Anxiety Level of Emergency Medical Services Professionals.

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare professionals are one of the groups most affected by a pandemic that affects the whole world. This study aimed to determine the anxiety level of emergency medical services professionals in Ankara, Turkey after the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In the first part of the survey, the participants of the study were asked about their socio-demographic characteristics and their contact with the COVID-19 patients. In the second part, a survey with 20 questions that determined the state anxiety level derived from the State Anxiety Inventory was performed after obtaining verbal consent. RESULTS: The mean age of the participants was 33.1±6.9, while 52.7% of all participants were males. In this study, the mean STAI Anxiety Score was 50.7±11.6. Anxiety scores were higher in females and those who had family members at risk of COVID-19 infection (p<0.05). The majority of those who had family members at risk of the infection started to stay in guesthouses instead of going home. Participants were worried about transmitting the infection to their family members (p<0.05). They felt more anxious when treating COVID-19 diagnosed or other patients (p<0.05). In addition, they thought that their anxiety level increased in general (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an anxiety increase in EMS workers in Turkey. Protecting the physical and mental health of the EMS employees who work at the front line against the COVID-19 pandemic and who have a high risk of infection, and ensuring their efficient work should be the main priority.

Effects of COVID-19 lockdown strategies on emergency medical services.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the change in the number of EMS cases by comparing the lockdown period, the non-lockdown period, and the pre-pandemic period. METHODS: In our study, 3 periods of EMS cases were compared to evaluate the effect of lockdown. The first period (Period A) included in the study was the lockdown period (01-12-2020 and 31-01-2021. The second period (period B) is the period between 01 and 10-2020 and 30-11-2020, where there was no lockdown despite the pandemic. The third period (period C) in the study is the period between 01 and 12-2019 and 31-01-2020 before the pandemic. RESULTS: A total of 120,989 cases in 3 periods were included in the study. It was determined that the highest number of patients were in period C (42,703, 35.3%), while the least was in period A (39,054, 32.2%). On the other hand, it was found that the number of calls was highest in period A (246,200, 35.1%), while the least was in period C (212,267, 30.2%). Response times were longer in the pandemic period than in the pre-pandemic period. Mean talk time were longer during the pandemic period. The most frequent diagnosis in period A (21.6%) and B (42.2%) was COVID-19. The second most frequent disease group in these two periods was cardiovascular diseases. CONCLUSION: While the number of EMS cases decreased during the pandemic period, it decreased even more during the lockdown period. However, the number of calls increased significantly during the lockdown period, and the response times and talk times increased accordingly.

Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Emergency Medical Services.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to analyse the changes that occurred after the COVID-19 pandemic using the data of EMS of Ankara province. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EMS data for the same time interval (March 11-April 24) in the last 3 years (2018, 2019 and 2020) were compared. RESULTS: While the number of calls increased by 90.9% during the pandemic period (from 2019 to 2020), the number of cases increased by 9.8%. Of all cases transported to hospital, 15.2% were suspected of and 2.9% were diagnosed with COVID-19. In the pandemic period, case frequency decreased in the 0-6 age group (-4.1%) and 7-18 age group (-39.9%) while the number of patients in the 19-65 age group (12.9%) and 65+ age group (21.5%) increased. There was a statistically significant difference between pre-pandemic and pandemic period in terms of rural area case frequency. During the pandemic period, case frequency of angina pectoris (-35.2%), myocardial infarction (-45%), acute abdomen (-23.8%) and cerebrovascular diseases (-2.9%) decreased contrary to pre-pandemic period (2019). During the same period, symptoms of fever (+14.1%) and cough (+956.3%) increased. There was a statistically significant difference between pre-pandemic and pandemic period in terms of forensic case frequency (P < .05). In addition, there was a statistically significant difference between these periods in terms of the frequency of patients who died at the scene. CONCLUSION: Although the use of ambulances has increased in the pandemic process, the use of EMS for time-sensitive diseases has decreased.

Transport of awake hypoxemic probable COVID 19 patients in the prone position.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the effects of transport with prone position on hypoxemia in hypoxemic and awake probable COVID 19 pneumonia patients. METHODS: Hypoxic and awake patients with probable COVID 19 pneumonia who were referred to the Ankara City Hospital Emergency Department from 1 April to 31 May 2020 were included in this prospective study. Patients were transported in prone position and fixed on the stretcher. During the transport, patients continued receiving 2 l per minute oxygen with nasal cannula. Arterial blood gases were obtained from the patients before and after transport. The transport time was recorded as minutes. The primary outcome of the study is the increase of partial oxygen value in the arterial blood gas of patients after transport. RESULTS: It was found that pO2 and SpO2 end values were statistically significantly higher in the patient group compared to the initial values. In the group with transport duration of more than 15 min, a difference was found between the initial and end values in pO2 and SpO2 parameters similar to the whole group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the initial and end values in the group with transport duration of 15 min or below. CONCLUSIONS: Awake hypoxemic patients can be transported without complications in prone position during transport. Transports more than 15 min, prone position may be recommended because the partial oxygen pressure of the patients increases.

Role of hematological parameters in COVID-19 patients in the emergency room.

Aim: In this study, the roles of biomarkers from a peripheral blood sample in the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients who have visited the emergency room have been evaluated. Materials & methods: Peripheral blood parameters, systemic inflammatory index (SII), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet lymphocyte ratio were compared in patients with and without confirmed COVID-19 infection. Results: Comparisons made according to real-time PCR test results revealed that while no statistically significant difference was observed between test groups (negative-positive) regarding lymphocyte and platelet lymphocyte ratio values (p > 0.05), a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the test groups regarding platelet, hemoglobin, leukocyte, neutrophil, NLR and SII values. Conclusion: Leukocyte, neutrophil, platelet count, NLR and SII values can be used in the diagnosis of COVID-19.